Since this was in my learning, naive days, I followed Jim Cramer’s advice and bought this mutual fund in a Roth IRA account.
This was probably one of the stupidest things I have done financially to date. Let’s analyze why.
- First, it is an actively managed fund. And, as we have found in many financial books (A Random Walk Down Wall Street, for example), 70% of actively managed mutual funds fail to beat the market index averages.
- Second, the expenses ratio/fee for owning the CGM Focus fund is 1.23%.
- This is much higher than the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index, whose expense ratio is 0.18%.
- The CGM Focus Fund cannot keep all of it’s money invested in equity at all times due to the fact that it has to maintain reserves to redeem shares when investors buy and sell shares. This decreases returns for investors.
- For example, CGM keeps >1% of it’s assets in cash vs. Vanguard’s Total Stock Market Index which maintains 0.31% in cash.
- Over the past 10 years…
- CGM Focus Fund has increased 120% vs. the S&P500 which has decreased 30% overall.
- Over the past 5 years…
- CGM Focus Fund has decreased 30% vs. the S&P500 which has decreased 15% overall.
- Over the past year…
- CGM Focus Fund has decreased 2% vs. the S&P500 which has increased 15% overall.
- Since I bought the CGM Focus Fund
- My holdings have decreased 22% overall. Wonderful!
- During this same time period, the S&P500 indexed decreased 19%, beating the CGM Focus Fund. Remember, this is even before considering the expense ratio of the CGM Focus fund further diminishing returns.
Why following recent “hot” fund managers does not work
Moolanomy.com recently put out a good piece discussing several reasons why past performance will not be the same going forward. See the link below for more information.
Recently, while reading the book by Jerry Tweddell titled, Winning With Index Mutual Funds, I came across a brilliant and very complete section about the reasons why “hot” mutual funds do not perform well in the future. The key findings are listed below.
- The top 20 best performing mutual funds from 1982-1992 fell to an average rank of 142 out of 309 funds in the period 1992-2002. This is basically reverting to average performance.
- When a fund becomes successful, publicity increases, causing more funds to pour in to the fund.
- All too often, this creates the situation of the mutual fund manager having more money than good ideas. This can even put pressure on the manager to purchase additional stocks that he or she is not as enthusiastic about.
- An increase in funds also means that the fund will need to bring in more personnel to handle additional workload. This can create additional people-management problems that the mutual fund manager must handle, distracting him or her from investment analysis.
- Success also increases the chances that a fund manager will be hired away to another firm or start their own business all-together. This increases the chance of turnover in the mutual fund.
- Since the published date, the CGM Focus Fund has decreased 54%, compared to the S&P500 index which has decreased 26%.
As you can see, Jim Cramer recommended the CGM Focus Fund when it was FAR outperforming the S&P500 index (in 3Q-4Q 2007). However, almost immediately after his book was published, the price decreased dramatically.
While there may have been other factors involved in this price decrease, it is interesting how it looks like a classic case of being doomed by your own success, as discussed by Tweddell in his book.
This will be the topic of future post. So, keep your eyes out for it! On the way soon!
How about you all? Do you all own actively managed funds? How have they performed compared to the market indices? Are you thinking of selling out of them?
My Personal Finance Journey
Learning For Life
To receive updates on topics such as this one as soon as they are published, click on the link below to subscribe to My Personal Finance Journey: