Is Social Security a Ponzi Scheme?

————————————————————————————————————————
Welcome to My Personal Finance Journey! If you are new here, please read the “About” or “First-Time Visitor” pages to find out more about us. If you would like to receive free updates on articles like this by email, then sign up here or you can subscribe to the RSS feed. Also, check us out on Twitter or Facebook. Thanks for visiting! Keep on learning!
————————————————————————————————————————

social security pyramid scam ponzi scheme home based business opportunities guest posting government spending

Click here to enter my free $250 giveaway for a chance to win 5% of My Personal Finance Journey blog income and give another 5% to a charity of your choosing! Deadline to enter is October 31st, 2011.


The following is a guest post from YFS from YourFinancesSimplified.com. Enjoy!

Is Social Security a Ponzi Scheme?
Yes, this might be a bit drastic, but people have asked this question before. 

Most recently, Rick Perry, the governor of Texas claimed that this is indeed the case at the Republican Debate.  Is there some grain of truth to this controversial claim, or was Perry simply gunning for attention by being controversial? We’ll try to obtain an answer to this question in today’s post.

What is a Ponzi Scheme?

By definition, a Ponzi scheme is a form of fraud. People are brought into a Ponzi scheme with the promise of high returns as a result of small investments. These schemes have to have a lot of people to work, and the head of the scheme works to recruit many people. In the end, the group or organization running the scheme is not profiting from actually doing anything, and they use the payments from new investors to pay earlier investors. 


Often, the later investors never actually receive money; they simply receive payment records that detail how much they are supposedly earning. Eventually, these schemes always collapse because eventually, investors pull out or the amount needed to pay earlier investors is higher than the amounts being newly invested. Sometimes, the person or group in charge of the scheme simply disappears with all the money. 

Perry’s Claim of Social Security Being a Ponzi Scheme

Perry is relating the government to the person in charge of the scheme who is simply going to “take the money and run,” like Bernie Madoff.

However, Social Security was never designed to be a form of fraud, and that is one of the main differences between the two systems. Everyone knows exactly what they are paying into. When you pay Social Security taxes, you expect to be able to draw on that money when you are eligible, and you expect that other able workers will pay into it like you did.  


Social Security is a pay-as-you-go system.  You pay money now to get money later.  The fact that Ponzi schemes and pay-as-you-go programs (like Social Security) both utilize money from later participants to pay the benefits to earlier participants is the reason why many people compare Social Security to a Ponzi scheme.  But, that is where the similarity ends.  

The State of Social Security

The strain on the system now is the massive efflux of Baby boomer retirees and the high unemployment rate. This means that there are a lot of people drawing on Social Security’s reserves, but there are not enough people paying into the system. Currently, the government is paying out everyone’s benefits. There are fears that in the near future, about 25 years from now, that the government will not be able to pay every retired individual who is eligible for Social Security benefits. The fact that people are living longer lives is also putting a strain on the system.

Without change, Social Security will collapse. In this way, it is exactly like a Ponzi scheme. It has become so large that it is untenable. However, this can be remedied, though that does not mean that we are going to like it. There are a few ways to make Social Security work. First, payroll taxes could be increased, and with that, more money will go into Social Security. Additionally, the amount of benefits that seniors currently receive might be decreased, and the age at which they can receive them will certainly increase.
Returning to Perry’s statement, it is likely that he was being controversial for attention. Social Security will not collapse like a Ponzi scheme, and it is not a fraud. Social Security will change, and whoever receives the added burden will complain, but once we reach 67 or 70 or whatever the required age ends up being, we will all be glad to receive our Social Security benefits.

How about you all? What are your thoughts on Social Security?  Do you agree or disagree with Rick Perry’s view of Social Security being a Ponzi Scheme? How much longer do you think Social Security will be around?

Jacob’s Thoughts – Listed below are my random thoughts as I was reading this article.

  • Thanks so much for sharing this guest post, YFS! I’m always happy to have a fellow Yakezie participant do a guest post, especially one on a topic as important as Social Security! 
  • Personally, I think that calling Social Security a full-blow Ponzi scheme is not quite fair and a little bit of stretch. After all, Ponzi schemes are illegal (fraud) and Social Security is not, as you mentioned above.
  • However, I won’t deny that Social Security does have some of the same characteristics, or flavor if you will, of a Ponzi scheme/pyramid scam. 
    • It would actually be quite interesting to hear some of the considerations and debates in Congress when Social Security was just being formed. I wonder if they really knew what they were getting in to committing for years to come to a huge government program like this.
  • Regardless of what we label Social Security, the fact of the matter is that the United States government and people are stuck with it, as many people rely on this today for supplemented living (a few of my relatives in fact).
  • As such, the more important questions I ask are 1) how can we improve Social Security, if at all? and 2) will it be around when future generations (mine, for example) retire? Or, will the funds be totally depleted? Let’s take a look at these questions one at a time. 
    • Regarding ways to improve Social Security, I have not analyzed this nor do I know enough about the workings of the program to offer suggestions. However, I did read a post this past summer from Ashley @ Money Talks that discussed an interesting idea of privatizing Social Security. It’s quite an idea, and definitely worth the read!
    • Regarding the second question about whether or not Social Security will still be around when future generations retire, I believe that it will be in some limited form. However, I would strongly encourage against depending on Social Security money for retirement living needs. Instead, invest regularly in a Roth IRA and 401k. 
  • Another common question that I wonder is this – Are the ever-popular “network marketing” (often called Multi-Level Marketing, or MLM) programs Ponzi schemes and/or pyramid scams? 
    • Some of these common programs include Empowerism, 4Life, Avon, and Amway. 
    • Truthfully, it’s somewhat of a legal masterpiece the way these opportunities are set up. The way it works is listed below:
      • The business offers products for sale (makeup, skin cream, vitamins, etc). 
      •  The company does not have to pay any full time sales reps, but instead offers the product sales “business opportunity” to individuals looking to earn a part time salary.
      • However, on top of selling the normal company products, the part-time sales people can recruit others to work in their “network” or “team.” The existing sales person earns money whenever new people enter in to their network. So, new money is funding the people already in the organization, similar to a Ponzi scheme.
    • To me, the way these programs are set up seems a little “hairy.” However, they have time and time again been proven 100% legal by the court system, since the sales reps also offer real products for sale.
    • What’s my problem with this, though? The problem I have is that in my experience (I’ve tried Empowerism and 4Life back when I was younger and nieve) and from what I’ve heard from others who have used network marketing, it’s nearly impossible to sell the actual products through these programs. Instead, most people make money on the programs through promoting the business opportunity.
    • So, I ask you all – do you think network marketing programs are pyramid scams? I’ll let you make up your own minds.

***Photo courtesy of http://www.flickr.com/photos/fdecomite/3865787618/

Comments

  1. You would think that in a pinch, the government would just create money out of thin air to pay for Social Security.
    My recent post 5 Common Mistakes When Buying Your First Home

  2. Thank you very much for allowing me to guest post!
    My recent post I’M TOO SEXY TO BUDGET

  3. We don't have social security in Canada but we have CPP and OAS which is similar. There have been numerous concerns that it will not be sustainable for future generations. I honestly don't know how it is going to work out but I do know that you have to save in addition to it. You will not be able to live on CPP and OAS or SS alone. If people started properly preparing for retirement early, this issue wouldn't be a concern.
    My recent post Skip the Gym, Sweat at Home 3

  4. Veritroth says:

    You forgot one important difference:

    At least Ponzi schemes are voluntary.

    • Veritroth,

      I will assume you agree with Rick Perry. Can you elaborate on why you feel social security is a ponzi scheme?
      My recent post Guest Post at My Personal Finance Journey – Is Social Security a Ponzi Scheme?

  5. I agree with what Veritroth commented. I never was asked if I wanted to pay Social Security- I do NOT, I do NOT want to pay in my hard earned money NOW to “Maybe” be used later when I am older. Social Security was NEVER meant to be someone's only income. a person should have money saved or investments or what have you. With all the kids, babies and young adults, not to mention all the OLD people drawing “Social Security disability”, there are hardly any people paying for the latter. It's all a big mess and if I were to ever become President I would abolish Social Security, Disability, HUD, welfare, Food stamps and every other form of abused “social programs” out there.

    People need to work for what they have, end of story.

    If, just if, they had to keep Social Security in place, then it should be only on the basis of what you paid in. So if you were 65 and had paid in $20,000.00 in Social Security over your earning lifetime, then $20,000.00 in payments would be all you could get.

    Everybody feels entitled to everything without doing anything.

    • Chris,

      You will be OK with having American citizens suffer? We would have old, disabled and people who did have the ability to produce wasting away in the streets. If everyone started on the same plain, and have the same opportunities and disadvantages I can see a reason to dismantle the programs but we do not live in a utopia.
      My recent post Mortgage rates are so low! So why aren’t people applying for mortgages?

      • @YFS:

        “You will be OK with having American citizens suffer?”

        This is a straw man argument, not unlike the kind Obama is habitually making when drawing false comparisons between his ideas and some extreme position few if any espouse.

        AFAIK, no one has suggested scrapping Social Security entirely as is it for today's retirees and those in the “retirement red zone.” Rather, serious proposals have been put forth to gradually replace a failed system (the Social Security Ponzi scheme) with a program that works.

        Case in point: The so-called privatization of Social Security . It was never going to be a 1-to-1 replacement of Social Security today, but the contributions (if you can call them such, since they are really confiscated from them involuntarily) of younger workers would be invested in a stock market index that would be higher in 20+ years time and yield far greater returns than the current insolvent Ponzi scheme we have today. The money that would go toward payments to those retired and going to be retired in less than 20 years would *not* be invested in the stock market.

        But that's not how it was covered. Democrats demagogued it as “taking all retirement savings and giving it all to wall street.” Even today it's not uncommon to see some pundits remark on how “lucky” we are that Social Security was not privatized since it would have been destroyed in the 2008 crash. This is simply not true.

        Instead, we are still careening toward bankruptcy. How lucky for us indeed.

        As for American citizens suffering, what do you call the last 3-4 years?
        My recent post Obama economics 2012 t-shirt

  6. That was my exact thought, that Social Security was established and is still operated with pure intentions to pay for retirement and to aid those in need. At no time did some fraudulent people get involved to rip off tax payers. And no one is saying that tax payers will be ripped off.
    My recent post How to Be a Fashionable "Sporty Spice"

  7. Damon@Debt Advice says:

    Socially Security is a form of a Ponzi scheme. The difference is the the government forcefully requires us to keep paying into it. Current retirees are getting paid out with the money we are contributing now. The government can simply create money or raise taxes to force us to keep paying for it. They continually change the game by lowering future benefits and raising the retirement age. For someone to think they are paying a fixed amount of money now, for a specific fixed amount of money 30 years from now would be fool hearty. You can’t trust a politician for much. They are more interested in placating the voting populace than they are in telling anyone the truth.

    Let me keep my own money and I will rely on myself for my future needs. I don’t need the government to take it and pretend they will hold it for me down the road.

Speak Your Mind

*

CommentLuv badge